1
00:00:00,799 --> 00:00:04,640
If you want inside peek into the data of what's working here

2
00:00:04,640 --> 00:00:08,400
now and today in 2025, boy, do I have a treat for

3
00:00:08,400 --> 00:00:12,160
you this episode. I'm excited to dive all the way

4
00:00:12,160 --> 00:00:15,945
into a recent study released by Metricool to give you

5
00:00:16,004 --> 00:00:19,305
the facts behind what actually is working

6
00:00:19,685 --> 00:00:22,645
here now and today. This is episode number

7
00:00:22,645 --> 00:00:26,404
345 of the Mindful Marketing podcast where I'm helping you scroll less,

8
00:00:26,404 --> 00:00:29,880
connect more, and grow together. But first,

9
00:00:30,019 --> 00:00:33,699
a word from our sponsor. Riverside is the all in

10
00:00:33,699 --> 00:00:37,540
one podcast recording and editing tool that I use for this right

11
00:00:37,540 --> 00:00:41,300
here show. I use it to edit not only the audio in the video,

12
00:00:41,300 --> 00:00:44,765
it is like chef's kiss, magical, making the entire process

13
00:00:45,385 --> 00:00:49,085
so so easy. Plus, I love their

14
00:00:49,225 --> 00:00:53,065
magic AI clips. Their little AI robot

15
00:00:53,065 --> 00:00:56,890
in the background pulls out the most impactful moments of the

16
00:00:56,890 --> 00:01:00,570
episodes without me having to comb through and do it myself, resizes them

17
00:01:00,570 --> 00:01:04,010
for social media. So those vertical videos you see on TikTok and

18
00:01:04,010 --> 00:01:07,850
reels, those all come from magic AI inside of Riverside. It's

19
00:01:07,850 --> 00:01:11,385
literally one click. It spits out 10 clips. I pick the

20
00:01:11,385 --> 00:01:15,065
best one and away I go saves me so much time. If you wanna get

21
00:01:15,065 --> 00:01:18,585
on the Riverside train, check it out today. The link's in the show notes and

22
00:01:18,585 --> 00:01:22,265
make sure to use my code drea, d r e a, at checkout to

23
00:01:22,265 --> 00:01:24,685
get 15% off your membership.

24
00:01:26,180 --> 00:01:30,020
I'm geeking out in this episode because y'all know I love to look at the

25
00:01:30,020 --> 00:01:33,860
data. And especially when it comes to marketing, there's a lot of

26
00:01:33,860 --> 00:01:37,320
feelings involved, especially social media marketing. It's so

27
00:01:37,460 --> 00:01:40,995
gosh darn public that we feel like everyone's

28
00:01:40,995 --> 00:01:44,755
judging us. K? And we also feel like, am I the only one?

29
00:01:44,755 --> 00:01:48,435
Like, why isn't this working for me? Or where should I focus my

30
00:01:48,435 --> 00:01:52,115
attention? Because this person says it's this platform, that person says

31
00:01:52,115 --> 00:01:55,940
it's that platform. So we're gonna get into the facts today of what's

32
00:01:55,940 --> 00:01:59,160
working, and that's why I love this study.

33
00:01:59,380 --> 00:02:03,220
Metricool is the tool that I recommend for social media scheduling

34
00:02:03,220 --> 00:02:06,585
and analytics, and I just love it. I just love it. Okay. So I will

35
00:02:06,585 --> 00:02:09,705
put the link to this study in the show notes as well if you wanna

36
00:02:09,705 --> 00:02:13,385
take a gander and a peek and a look for yourself. But

37
00:02:13,385 --> 00:02:17,065
just to frame where we are, this is not the first time

38
00:02:17,065 --> 00:02:20,760
they've done this study. And in fact, in previous episodes, I've

39
00:02:20,760 --> 00:02:24,200
gone over the data. Also, side note, if you're watching the video, I'm looking at

40
00:02:24,200 --> 00:02:27,099
my screen a lot because I'm looking at the data. Okay? Okay.

41
00:02:27,959 --> 00:02:30,680
So in this study, they, looked at

42
00:02:30,680 --> 00:02:34,255
2024 as a whole, and they looked at

43
00:02:34,255 --> 00:02:38,035
over 21,000,000 posts

44
00:02:38,415 --> 00:02:42,114
across eight different platforms, LinkedIn, Facebook,

45
00:02:42,175 --> 00:02:44,995
TikTok, x, Instagram,

46
00:02:46,250 --> 00:02:50,090
YouTube. I'm missing one. Facebook ads. They looked at a

47
00:02:50,090 --> 00:02:53,310
lot of places, and they, studied

48
00:02:53,450 --> 00:02:57,209
the results of what is working and

49
00:02:57,209 --> 00:03:01,005
what is not based on comparing the platforms to themselves and the posts

50
00:03:01,325 --> 00:03:04,925
to themselves as well. So it's a lot of data

51
00:03:04,925 --> 00:03:07,665
points that we're looking at. But, specifically,

52
00:03:08,605 --> 00:03:12,445
Meta is dominating this data. So I do wanna, like, put that as

53
00:03:12,445 --> 00:03:14,545
a caveat. Instagram

54
00:03:15,840 --> 00:03:19,680
posts and Facebook posts and accounts tend to dominate a

55
00:03:19,680 --> 00:03:23,060
lot of the data. In fact, most of the data comes from those two places.

56
00:03:23,840 --> 00:03:27,140
Kind of in the middle of the road, we do have TikTok,

57
00:03:27,360 --> 00:03:31,125
LinkedIn, and YouTube still have some pretty high, results there

58
00:03:31,125 --> 00:03:34,885
with the bottom of this study looking at x oh, Twitch is the one I

59
00:03:34,885 --> 00:03:38,485
forgot earlier in Pinterest. So when we're looking at all of

60
00:03:38,485 --> 00:03:41,385
these these data points, just keep in mind that Meta,

61
00:03:41,845 --> 00:03:45,400
Facebook, Instagram, is dominating. Also keep in mind,

62
00:03:45,400 --> 00:03:48,540
threads isn't on here. There isn't a lot of data points,

63
00:03:48,920 --> 00:03:52,680
from threads specifically. It's just the way that they share their data. It's not

64
00:03:52,680 --> 00:03:56,219
like that. So I'm hoping in future studies, Metrc will includes

65
00:03:56,280 --> 00:04:00,025
threads in this data as well. And, of course, some of the newer platforms

66
00:04:00,025 --> 00:04:03,725
like Blue Sky, or some of the TikTok competitors

67
00:04:03,785 --> 00:04:07,385
like, Clapper or Lemonade aren't in this study as well.

68
00:04:07,545 --> 00:04:11,245
There's just not enough people on there for that to, make sense.

69
00:04:11,520 --> 00:04:15,120
The other thing to note with this study is they kind of categorize things based

70
00:04:15,120 --> 00:04:18,880
on account size, which I really appreciate. Because when we look at

71
00:04:18,880 --> 00:04:22,560
strategies and apply them to different accounts, a strategy that works

72
00:04:22,560 --> 00:04:26,000
for an account with 50,000 followers isn't going to be the

73
00:04:26,000 --> 00:04:29,695
same when you have 500 followers. K? So I

74
00:04:29,695 --> 00:04:33,155
do like that they broke it down into five different categories.

75
00:04:33,615 --> 00:04:37,294
Tiny accounts have less than 500 followers. Small

76
00:04:37,294 --> 00:04:39,955
accounts have between 502,000.

77
00:04:41,120 --> 00:04:44,560
Medium accounts have between 12,000. Big

78
00:04:44,560 --> 00:04:48,400
accounts are, 10,000 to 50,000, and then huge

79
00:04:48,400 --> 00:04:52,240
accounts are over 50,000 followers. Okay. So they are

80
00:04:52,240 --> 00:04:55,680
looking at community size when it comes to some of these

81
00:04:55,680 --> 00:04:59,405
platforms. Alright. So overall, in

82
00:04:59,405 --> 00:05:03,085
2024, clicks on Pinterest did

83
00:05:03,085 --> 00:05:06,685
increase. This is Pinterest. Increased by

84
00:05:06,685 --> 00:05:10,285
55, which I found interesting. On

85
00:05:10,285 --> 00:05:13,410
Twitch, subscriptions decreased by

86
00:05:13,410 --> 00:05:17,090
88%. Then we'll see later that views still increase, but

87
00:05:17,090 --> 00:05:20,390
subscriptions, people subscribing to Twitch channels drastically

88
00:05:20,610 --> 00:05:24,370
decreased last year, which is interesting. I think, that's because of

89
00:05:24,370 --> 00:05:27,615
YouTube, which we'll see later. LinkedIn interactions

90
00:05:27,995 --> 00:05:30,655
increased on average by 99%.

91
00:05:31,675 --> 00:05:35,354
Ninety nine %. This is why I recently did the LinkedIn challenge. I'm

92
00:05:35,354 --> 00:05:38,815
all about like, I've been doing it for seven years. LinkedIn has consistently

93
00:05:39,220 --> 00:05:42,820
increased and the data is showing. There's just a lot happening on that platform right

94
00:05:42,820 --> 00:05:45,960
now. X, we saw a lot of decreases

95
00:05:46,260 --> 00:05:49,320
over, the past year or two. But most interestingly,

96
00:05:50,020 --> 00:05:53,240
impressions have increased by half, 15%.

97
00:05:54,625 --> 00:05:58,385
Instagram, your post reach has increased by fifth by

98
00:05:58,385 --> 00:06:02,225
21%, excuse me, but Reels reach has decreased by

99
00:06:02,225 --> 00:06:05,905
20%. So your regular post, we're talking like a static post or

100
00:06:05,905 --> 00:06:09,639
carousel post, has increased in reach. Reels has decreased. So we'll

101
00:06:09,639 --> 00:06:13,340
see later that Reels still dominates as one of the most interactive

102
00:06:13,400 --> 00:06:17,240
post styles. Facebook post reach has

103
00:06:17,240 --> 00:06:20,280
decreased by 41% and Reels reach has increased by

104
00:06:20,280 --> 00:06:23,800
13. Lastly, TikTok or sorry, second to last,

105
00:06:23,800 --> 00:06:26,815
TikTok, average watch time still has increased by

106
00:06:26,815 --> 00:06:30,255
71%, k, versus what it was in

107
00:06:30,255 --> 00:06:34,014
2023. So TikTok, despite the threat of

108
00:06:34,014 --> 00:06:37,615
big band, people are still watching it even more than they were the previous

109
00:06:37,615 --> 00:06:41,310
year. And then on YouTube engagement, specifically, dislikes has

110
00:06:41,310 --> 00:06:44,990
gone up by 11%. K? So that was kinda like their

111
00:06:44,990 --> 00:06:48,510
highlight reel of here's what you can expect. Now let's get

112
00:06:48,510 --> 00:06:52,110
into, the key metrics the key metrics.

113
00:06:52,110 --> 00:06:55,235
So generally speaking, based on this data,

114
00:06:55,855 --> 00:06:59,535
the larger your audience, the better the results. So the

115
00:06:59,535 --> 00:07:03,215
more followers you have, the better results you will get in terms

116
00:07:03,215 --> 00:07:07,055
of views and engagement. That is still true based on

117
00:07:07,055 --> 00:07:10,710
this study. I will be curious to see, though, how

118
00:07:10,710 --> 00:07:14,490
this turns out with twenty twenty five's data because,

119
00:07:14,870 --> 00:07:18,330
platforms like Meta, specifically Adam Mosseri, has shared

120
00:07:18,710 --> 00:07:22,365
that followers are becoming less and less important, and we're looking

121
00:07:22,365 --> 00:07:26,145
at views as a metric of success. That being said,

122
00:07:26,604 --> 00:07:30,044
it seems like the algorithms are still favoring accounts who have more

123
00:07:30,044 --> 00:07:33,880
followers versus ones that don't. So

124
00:07:33,880 --> 00:07:37,480
the data is showing that, you know, if you wanna reach more people, you kinda

125
00:07:37,480 --> 00:07:41,000
larger need a larger community, which, you know, it's a chicken and the

126
00:07:41,000 --> 00:07:43,020
egg scenario, but here we are.

127
00:07:44,440 --> 00:07:48,175
Okay. Let's look at, generationally. So,

128
00:07:48,715 --> 00:07:52,555
a lot of people claim that, you know, baby boomers are not on

129
00:07:52,555 --> 00:07:56,315
social or Gen zed is not on social. Sorry, Gen z is not I

130
00:07:56,315 --> 00:08:00,020
keep saying zed y'all because here in Canada, we say zed instead

131
00:08:00,020 --> 00:08:03,780
of zed. And my toddler, she's almost three, is

132
00:08:03,780 --> 00:08:07,300
correcting me whenever I say zed. Because I'm US born and raised,

133
00:08:07,540 --> 00:08:10,900
been in Canada for ten years. But if I say, like, x y z, she'll

134
00:08:10,900 --> 00:08:14,660
be like, no, mom. It's zed. And I'm like, oh, okay. Excuse

135
00:08:14,660 --> 00:08:17,935
me. Anyways, Gen z, Gen z, whatever.

136
00:08:18,875 --> 00:08:22,235
They're on the socials. Okay? They're on the socials, but let's break it

137
00:08:22,235 --> 00:08:25,534
down by platform. I'm gonna give you a few highlights here.

138
00:08:26,474 --> 00:08:30,235
Interestingly enough, millennials, we are on all the social

139
00:08:30,235 --> 00:08:33,840
medias. And I'm not I'm not surprised by it, but when I saw the data,

140
00:08:33,840 --> 00:08:37,520
I was like, oh, we're equally everywhere. Gen x is not

141
00:08:37,520 --> 00:08:41,280
far behind with that, with most of Gen x being on every platform, though they're

142
00:08:41,280 --> 00:08:43,620
not as fan as fond of TikTok,

143
00:08:45,120 --> 00:08:48,625
as well. Facebook still is the platform

144
00:08:48,845 --> 00:08:52,385
for, baby boomers, but do not let

145
00:08:52,685 --> 00:08:56,145
anyone say that no one's on Facebook. Facebook is still

146
00:08:56,445 --> 00:08:59,820
the platform with the most people. So when we look at the data, you know,

147
00:08:59,820 --> 00:09:03,660
Facebook has over 3,000,000,000, accounts. Right? So when we look at the

148
00:09:03,660 --> 00:09:07,440
data, whenever someone says, oh, Facebook doesn't matter, it's like, okay, you're comparing

149
00:09:07,580 --> 00:09:10,400
3,000,000,000 accounts though. So, yes,

150
00:09:11,180 --> 00:09:14,995
engagement and and post reach and things may be down. But, like, if we look

151
00:09:14,995 --> 00:09:18,595
at the data, it's like, okay. So it's down

152
00:09:18,595 --> 00:09:22,435
compared to Facebook, but it's so much higher than other platforms. So keep

153
00:09:22,435 --> 00:09:25,255
that in mind. Also interestingly,

154
00:09:26,435 --> 00:09:30,190
baby boomers are on LinkedIn secondarily after

155
00:09:30,190 --> 00:09:33,949
Facebook. So if that is your target demo, Facebook and

156
00:09:33,949 --> 00:09:37,310
LinkedIn are great for baby boomers. Skip

157
00:09:37,310 --> 00:09:40,449
Twitch and skip TikTok if you're a baby boomer.

158
00:09:41,149 --> 00:09:44,845
Gen x, pretty much everywhere, though mostly on

159
00:09:44,845 --> 00:09:48,685
Facebook and YouTube. The platform that they're least on

160
00:09:48,685 --> 00:09:52,225
is Twitch, followed by TikTok. Millennials,

161
00:09:53,005 --> 00:09:56,730
we are everywhere almost equally as much, though interestingly

162
00:09:57,029 --> 00:10:00,250
enough I keep saying that because I I find this data fascinating.

163
00:10:01,350 --> 00:10:05,110
LinkedIn. Millennials. We're on the LinkedIn. It kinda

164
00:10:05,110 --> 00:10:08,870
makes sense because we're like most of the job force right now, aren't

165
00:10:08,870 --> 00:10:12,535
we? I don't know if I'm lying about that. But a lot on LinkedIn,

166
00:10:12,995 --> 00:10:16,835
but honestly, this is almost neck and neck

167
00:10:16,835 --> 00:10:20,195
with, Facebook, Instagram, and

168
00:10:20,195 --> 00:10:23,110
x. We're everywhere. K?

169
00:10:23,810 --> 00:10:27,110
Jin Zed, mostly on Twitch, which is

170
00:10:27,250 --> 00:10:30,130
interesting. They're they're they have the least,

171
00:10:30,690 --> 00:10:34,210
presence, should I say that, on Facebook. K? So Jin Zed, not

172
00:10:34,210 --> 00:10:37,964
really using Facebook that much, not really using LinkedIn

173
00:10:37,964 --> 00:10:41,805
that much. Understandable. They they like the

174
00:10:41,805 --> 00:10:44,945
Twitch. They like the TikTok. They like Instagram.

175
00:10:45,885 --> 00:10:49,404
They like YouTube, but not really anywhere else.

176
00:10:49,404 --> 00:10:53,170
Okay? So let's dive into the next one they

177
00:10:53,170 --> 00:10:56,770
have on here, which is growing your account. So if

178
00:10:56,770 --> 00:10:59,750
you, wanna grow your account

179
00:11:00,370 --> 00:11:04,005
and you have less than 500 followers,

180
00:11:04,625 --> 00:11:08,305
according to this study, the platform that you should be on is

181
00:11:08,305 --> 00:11:12,145
Instagram. So tiny accounts less than 500 followers

182
00:11:12,145 --> 00:11:15,985
see that most success on Instagram followed by YouTube. And I

183
00:11:15,985 --> 00:11:19,610
wanna mention that because there's gonna be a trend here with YouTube in this

184
00:11:19,610 --> 00:11:23,370
entire report. So Instagram followed by YouTube. So keep that in

185
00:11:23,370 --> 00:11:26,329
mind if you're starting from scratch. If you're starting from scratch and you have less

186
00:11:26,329 --> 00:11:30,010
than 500 followers, Facebook is at the bottom of the list. Don't even try

187
00:11:30,010 --> 00:11:33,765
it. It's gonna be really hard to grow that account. Okay? So

188
00:11:33,765 --> 00:11:37,605
that's interesting. Okay. Now generally speaking, for the rest of

189
00:11:37,605 --> 00:11:40,745
us, YouTube is the way to go. Okay? So,

190
00:11:41,285 --> 00:11:45,125
looking at the rest of the accounts, like, excluding small accounts, because small accounts, it's

191
00:11:45,125 --> 00:11:48,529
clearly Instagram. But looking at the rest of the accounts, YouTube

192
00:11:48,589 --> 00:11:51,889
is the fastest way to grow subscribers,

193
00:11:52,269 --> 00:11:56,110
followers, whatever, by leaps and bounds over everyone

194
00:11:56,110 --> 00:11:59,949
else. It's followed by Instagram, followed by TikTok. K? They're not that far

195
00:11:59,949 --> 00:12:03,334
apart. 41% for YouTube, 39% for

196
00:12:03,334 --> 00:12:06,935
Instagram, 34% for TikTok. But YouTube

197
00:12:06,935 --> 00:12:10,615
is clearly the winner here. All of these platforms are

198
00:12:10,615 --> 00:12:14,170
highly focused on video, so just note that. Again,

199
00:12:14,170 --> 00:12:17,930
Facebook's at the bottom. Like, even x is above Facebook right now as far

200
00:12:17,930 --> 00:12:21,690
in terms of follower growth. So keep that in mind. If you're looking to

201
00:12:21,690 --> 00:12:25,230
start a new strategy, you may wanna consider YouTube

202
00:12:25,530 --> 00:12:29,175
or maybe even Instagram or maybe even TikTok, but YouTube is the

203
00:12:29,175 --> 00:12:33,015
fastest growing for all accounts. Now let's take a look

204
00:12:33,015 --> 00:12:35,355
at the accounts specifically

205
00:12:36,455 --> 00:12:40,055
and, what you can expect as you're diving

206
00:12:40,055 --> 00:12:43,195
into growing your accounts and what the data is saying there.

207
00:12:43,810 --> 00:12:47,410
So first up, we're going to look at, small accounts.

208
00:12:47,410 --> 00:12:50,470
So tiny and small accounts. If you have less than

209
00:12:50,610 --> 00:12:53,829
2,000 followers, YouTube,

210
00:12:54,529 --> 00:12:58,365
the average impressions per follower has increased

211
00:12:58,365 --> 00:13:01,885
by over 600% for small accounts. So less than

212
00:13:01,885 --> 00:13:05,505
2,000 followers, less than 2,000 subscribers. Impressions per follower

213
00:13:05,565 --> 00:13:09,005
has increased quite significantly from 2023 to

214
00:13:09,005 --> 00:13:12,720
2024. We saw decreases on TikTok and massive

215
00:13:12,720 --> 00:13:16,560
decreases on Reels. So, again, the data is showing if

216
00:13:16,560 --> 00:13:20,100
you wanna grow, YouTube is where it's at, followed by TikTok and Reels.

217
00:13:21,760 --> 00:13:25,355
If you have a mid size account, this

218
00:13:25,355 --> 00:13:29,135
particular example is looking at 2,000 to 50,000 followers.

219
00:13:29,355 --> 00:13:32,975
YouTube still has the highest average impressions per follower,

220
00:13:33,035 --> 00:13:35,215
again, over 600%,

221
00:13:36,630 --> 00:13:40,250
followed by TikTok, followed by, Reels specifically.

222
00:13:40,950 --> 00:13:44,010
But those are both showing decreases year over year

223
00:13:44,470 --> 00:13:48,165
impressions per follower. So what that basically means is based

224
00:13:48,165 --> 00:13:51,705
on the number of followers you have, the impressions

225
00:13:51,845 --> 00:13:55,525
per follower is increasing on YouTube and is decreasing everywhere else.

226
00:13:55,525 --> 00:13:59,305
So your content is more likely to be seen on

227
00:13:59,365 --> 00:14:01,945
YouTube. It's leading the way for visibility.

228
00:14:02,990 --> 00:14:06,750
But TikTok and Instagram Reels are positioned as another solid

229
00:14:06,750 --> 00:14:10,510
option. I'll put a little asterisk on this to say, at the beginning

230
00:14:10,510 --> 00:14:14,270
of this year in 2025, Adam Mosseri said Instagram is

231
00:14:14,270 --> 00:14:18,110
kind of, deprioritizing Reels a little bit and focusing in on carousel

232
00:14:18,110 --> 00:14:21,765
posts. Right? So the data for this next year will is gonna change

233
00:14:21,765 --> 00:14:25,525
based on how Instagram is kind of, guiding their algorithm, even

234
00:14:25,525 --> 00:14:28,985
though this past data is showing that that's the case.

235
00:14:29,365 --> 00:14:32,905
So it'll be interesting to see that. I think it's it's curious because,

236
00:14:34,320 --> 00:14:38,160
Instagram is fighting so hard to be, like, the alternative for TikTok. But

237
00:14:38,160 --> 00:14:41,360
I've said here on this podcast before, and I'll say it again, YouTube is the

238
00:14:41,360 --> 00:14:44,900
clear choice for this. X, LinkedIn,

239
00:14:45,120 --> 00:14:48,415
and its Instagram stories are actually

240
00:14:48,634 --> 00:14:52,475
showing that if you grow more followers, the the,

241
00:14:52,795 --> 00:14:56,315
impressions on your post don't actually increase, for

242
00:14:56,315 --> 00:14:59,920
those platforms. Okay? So you may see this as you're growing your

243
00:14:59,920 --> 00:15:03,680
LinkedIn followers, your ex followers, your Instagram, followers. As

244
00:15:03,680 --> 00:15:07,460
you grow them, you may not see your stories, your your post, your ex post

245
00:15:07,520 --> 00:15:11,365
necessarily grow as well. I thought that was interesting. Alright.

246
00:15:11,365 --> 00:15:14,725
So we looked at followers and impressions. Now let's look at

247
00:15:14,725 --> 00:15:18,404
interactions and engagement because we all know

248
00:15:18,404 --> 00:15:22,084
it's not about just people seeing our content. We want people to kind of

249
00:15:22,084 --> 00:15:25,800
have a reaction to it. We want them to signal to

250
00:15:25,800 --> 00:15:29,640
us that they're interested in some way, and engagement is oftentimes the

251
00:15:29,640 --> 00:15:33,100
best way to do this. So right now, interactions

252
00:15:33,240 --> 00:15:37,020
per follower, leading platform by leaps and bounds is YouTube.

253
00:15:37,160 --> 00:15:40,805
Still, YouTube, interactions per follower. And they're kind of

254
00:15:40,805 --> 00:15:44,325
lumping in a bunch of interactions here as well. But

255
00:15:44,325 --> 00:15:47,145
overall, interactions per follower is increased,

256
00:15:47,925 --> 00:15:51,685
followed by TikTok. TikTok's not, is is kind of far

257
00:15:51,685 --> 00:15:55,490
behind. So and this is looking at, sorry, accounts with less

258
00:15:55,490 --> 00:15:58,950
than 2,000 followers for this specific data.

259
00:15:59,490 --> 00:16:03,170
Actually, no. Whether you have less than 2,000, they broke it down in the study.

260
00:16:03,170 --> 00:16:07,010
So less than 2,000 or 2,000 to 50,000, honestly, the data

261
00:16:07,010 --> 00:16:10,635
is not that different. YouTube is winning by leaps and bounds as far

262
00:16:10,635 --> 00:16:14,255
as engagement goes. It's just dominating with interaction.

263
00:16:14,394 --> 00:16:18,235
So especially accounts with larger followers, there

264
00:16:18,235 --> 00:16:21,860
is a significant advantage here on the average

265
00:16:21,860 --> 00:16:25,560
interaction per follower. K? So average interaction per follower

266
00:16:26,020 --> 00:16:29,640
massively increased on all platforms, specifically

267
00:16:29,860 --> 00:16:33,300
YouTube. The next in line is TikTok here. So it goes

268
00:16:33,300 --> 00:16:37,125
YouTube, TikTok, and then if you have a smaller account, it's

269
00:16:37,125 --> 00:16:40,645
LinkedIn. But if you have over, 2,000 followers, it's Instagram

270
00:16:40,645 --> 00:16:44,485
Reels. K? So what that tells me is, again, if

271
00:16:44,485 --> 00:16:47,925
you're starting from scratch, YouTube and TikTok are

272
00:16:47,925 --> 00:16:51,440
great for those interactions then LinkedIn or

273
00:16:51,440 --> 00:16:54,959
potentially Instagram Reels here. Okay? Don't worry about

274
00:16:54,959 --> 00:16:58,800
x. Facebook is very challenging right now. It's, like, consistently at the bottom

275
00:16:58,800 --> 00:17:02,240
of the list. We're not Pinterest isn't even on this list, and neither is

276
00:17:02,240 --> 00:17:05,825
Twitch. Okay? So, yeah, it looks like X and

277
00:17:05,825 --> 00:17:09,424
Facebook Reels are actually going backwards in terms of interactions here, which is

278
00:17:09,424 --> 00:17:13,184
wild. Alright. Next, let's look at engagement. Okay. So we

279
00:17:13,184 --> 00:17:16,884
looked at interactions, which they define as

280
00:17:17,024 --> 00:17:20,730
like, comment, or share, and then engagement,

281
00:17:21,109 --> 00:17:24,790
specifically, engagement rate we're looking at here, which is

282
00:17:24,790 --> 00:17:28,630
total interactions divided by reach. Okay? So we're not just

283
00:17:28,630 --> 00:17:32,470
looking at interactions by itself in a bubble. We're looking at

284
00:17:32,470 --> 00:17:35,995
engagement rate. So how many people watch this

285
00:17:35,995 --> 00:17:39,535
video versus how many people liked it or engaged with it?

286
00:17:39,755 --> 00:17:43,275
Engagement rate, I think, is important because it does take into

287
00:17:43,275 --> 00:17:46,875
account your community size. It does take into account your,

288
00:17:47,195 --> 00:17:51,010
potential for engagement as well. Because oftentimes, you know, we

289
00:17:51,010 --> 00:17:54,390
see these videos that go viral and all of that, but we don't necessarily

290
00:17:54,930 --> 00:17:58,450
want to have videos just randomly go viral with people actually not

291
00:17:58,450 --> 00:18:01,910
engaging with them. K. It's not just the views. It's how people,

292
00:18:02,450 --> 00:18:06,015
interact with that post itself. K? So

293
00:18:06,015 --> 00:18:09,375
engagement rate, which platform saw increases? And I'm gonna look at,

294
00:18:09,855 --> 00:18:13,615
this is broken down as two categories again. If you have less than

295
00:18:13,615 --> 00:18:17,075
2,000 followers, LinkedIn engagement rate has actually

296
00:18:17,135 --> 00:18:20,870
increased quite a bit by 14% since 2023,

297
00:18:20,870 --> 00:18:24,470
followed by, surprisingly, Facebook posts.

298
00:18:24,470 --> 00:18:28,010
Facebook posts engagement rate has increased if you have less than 2,000 followers.

299
00:18:28,470 --> 00:18:31,270
K? Now if you have between

300
00:18:31,270 --> 00:18:34,965
52,000 followers, LinkedIn engagement rate

301
00:18:34,965 --> 00:18:38,405
still is at the top there followed by Facebook post. But I wanna mention

302
00:18:38,405 --> 00:18:42,245
Instagram reels here because that has also increased. So if

303
00:18:42,245 --> 00:18:45,765
you have an account between 250,000 followers sorry,

304
00:18:45,765 --> 00:18:49,400
200,000 to 50,000 followers, Those are the platforms to look

305
00:18:49,400 --> 00:18:52,700
at. On the bottom of the list for both of these is YouTube.

306
00:18:53,160 --> 00:18:56,840
So while YouTube we're seeing the higher your community

307
00:18:56,840 --> 00:19:00,200
is, the more they interact, and we're seeing it's easier to

308
00:19:00,200 --> 00:19:03,100
grow, overall, it looks like,

309
00:19:04,245 --> 00:19:08,025
people aren't as engaged on YouTube as they were in previous years.

310
00:19:08,325 --> 00:19:11,285
My theory behind this is,

311
00:19:12,005 --> 00:19:15,605
YouTube TV. So a lot of people are watching

312
00:19:15,605 --> 00:19:19,080
YouTube now on bigger screens. And I

313
00:19:19,080 --> 00:19:22,540
think, my theory again, is that the the community

314
00:19:22,680 --> 00:19:26,280
element of YouTube is actually not as big as it used to

315
00:19:26,280 --> 00:19:29,880
be. Like, commenting and liking on YouTube videos used to be a bigger

316
00:19:29,880 --> 00:19:33,320
deal than it is now. A lot of people like to just

317
00:19:33,320 --> 00:19:36,915
watch. They like to just consume the video. And so I don't necessarily

318
00:19:37,054 --> 00:19:39,934
see that as a bad thing of engagement rate going down, but I did wanna

319
00:19:39,934 --> 00:19:43,535
note that YouTube is on the bottom of this list. Like, engagement rates,

320
00:19:43,535 --> 00:19:47,155
so the number of engagements you get per view, has decreased

321
00:19:47,375 --> 00:19:51,040
year over year. Alright. Now let's talk about conversions. People click

322
00:19:51,040 --> 00:19:54,480
in, people take an action, because it's not always just about

323
00:19:54,480 --> 00:19:57,700
visibility. We want people to take the next step.

324
00:19:58,320 --> 00:20:01,795
Now when we look at clicks, clicks per post

325
00:20:01,935 --> 00:20:05,235
specifically, LinkedIn, if you have an account

326
00:20:05,935 --> 00:20:09,315
less than 2,000 followers, LinkedIn, you're getting,

327
00:20:09,855 --> 00:20:13,620
23 clicks per post on average. And if you

328
00:20:13,620 --> 00:20:16,740
have 2,000 to 50,000 followers, you're getting a

329
00:20:16,740 --> 00:20:20,420
56 clicks per post on average. So

330
00:20:20,420 --> 00:20:23,860
LinkedIn is converting the most when it

331
00:20:23,860 --> 00:20:27,554
comes to clicks, followed by Facebook

332
00:20:27,695 --> 00:20:31,375
posts, followed by Pinterest. K? So

333
00:20:31,375 --> 00:20:35,054
I found that quite interesting that when we're thinking

334
00:20:35,054 --> 00:20:38,755
about, you know, attracting our community, YouTube,

335
00:20:38,815 --> 00:20:42,290
Instagram reels, and TikTok posts are dominating

336
00:20:42,670 --> 00:20:46,130
that category. When we think about converting

337
00:20:46,270 --> 00:20:49,630
though, LinkedIn, Facebook posts, and Pinterest is

338
00:20:49,630 --> 00:20:53,470
dominating that category. I will say this though. This is me

339
00:20:53,470 --> 00:20:57,255
adding color to the the facts here of this, study.

340
00:20:58,115 --> 00:21:01,795
I have seen time and time again, platforms like Pinterest drive the most

341
00:21:01,795 --> 00:21:05,155
traffic. Right? When I look at the report surface level, I'm like, oh my gosh.

342
00:21:05,155 --> 00:21:08,535
Look at all this beautiful traffic coming in from Pinterest. However,

343
00:21:09,270 --> 00:21:12,870
when you dig into the the data deeper, the time on the page is

344
00:21:12,870 --> 00:21:16,550
shorter and then actions on, like, after that traffic lands on your

345
00:21:16,550 --> 00:21:20,310
page is almost nonexistent. So you do wanna, like, peel back

346
00:21:20,310 --> 00:21:23,875
the layers of your own data a little bit more and be a little bit

347
00:21:23,875 --> 00:21:27,635
critical about it. So, you know, Pinterest, again, clicks

348
00:21:27,635 --> 00:21:31,475
for posts, you know, you're getting more than other platforms, but how valuable

349
00:21:31,475 --> 00:21:35,075
are those clicks? Are they actually signing up for things on your website? Are they

350
00:21:35,075 --> 00:21:38,610
converting on page? Are they doing something, on

351
00:21:38,610 --> 00:21:41,669
page? Also, Pinterest just tends to be so far,

352
00:21:42,610 --> 00:21:46,370
at the top of people's buying decision. Like, they're so early in the buying

353
00:21:46,370 --> 00:21:50,210
process that it can be challenging to make a decision based on, Pinterest

354
00:21:50,210 --> 00:21:53,715
activity. Not saying don't do it. I'm just saying the data is

355
00:21:53,715 --> 00:21:57,475
harder to track. A few other so as I wrap

356
00:21:57,475 --> 00:22:01,075
up, I wanna share a few other interesting things that they noted in this study.

357
00:22:01,075 --> 00:22:04,900
These aren't, like, interconnected ideas at all, and I'm not gonna share

358
00:22:04,900 --> 00:22:07,220
all of the things that they put kind of in the back half of the

359
00:22:07,220 --> 00:22:11,000
study. I just wanna share the things that I think would be most interesting

360
00:22:11,300 --> 00:22:15,140
to you, dear listener. Okay. Pinterest is

361
00:22:15,140 --> 00:22:18,865
an interesting platform because Pinterest actually seems to be having a little bit of a

362
00:22:18,865 --> 00:22:22,645
resurgence. I think I've shared this, on here before, but

363
00:22:23,025 --> 00:22:26,865
my sister actually watches her videos on Pinterest. Like, she'll send me

364
00:22:26,865 --> 00:22:30,485
Pinterest videos. I'm like, I saw this on TikTok, like, two months ago, but okay.

365
00:22:30,785 --> 00:22:34,620
It's cute. So, there's a dedicated community over there.

366
00:22:34,680 --> 00:22:38,140
Over 500,000,000 monthly active users on Pinterest.

367
00:22:38,520 --> 00:22:42,220
42% are Gen z. K. So largest

368
00:22:42,520 --> 00:22:46,280
segment of that platform is Gen z. Keep in

369
00:22:46,280 --> 00:22:49,585
mind though, it just tends to be so early in the buying

370
00:22:49,965 --> 00:22:53,804
process. Okay. I mentioned Twitch earlier and how

371
00:22:53,804 --> 00:22:57,644
their subscriptions are down by 88%, but most interestingly is that

372
00:22:57,644 --> 00:23:01,080
there are more accounts on Twitch. So people are

373
00:23:01,080 --> 00:23:04,860
still signing up for Twitch accounts. They are still,

374
00:23:05,960 --> 00:23:09,560
watching. They're just not subscribing. And this goes again into my

375
00:23:09,560 --> 00:23:13,320
prediction of in my predictions episode that I recorded, what,

376
00:23:13,320 --> 00:23:17,145
like, four months, five months ago now, is that subscribers and follower

377
00:23:17,145 --> 00:23:20,825
numbers aren't going to be as important in this next evolution of social

378
00:23:20,825 --> 00:23:24,505
media. People don't necessarily need to follow or subscribe to see your

379
00:23:24,505 --> 00:23:28,105
content because the algorithm's just gonna serve it up to them anyway. So I think

380
00:23:28,105 --> 00:23:30,580
that's an interesting thing to note,

381
00:23:31,840 --> 00:23:35,600
for Twitch specifically. Also noted

382
00:23:35,600 --> 00:23:39,440
for Twitch, there's not as much content going out, as well.

383
00:23:39,440 --> 00:23:43,285
So people aren't posting as frequently as they used to, which

384
00:23:43,285 --> 00:23:46,425
I thought that was interesting. A couple significant

385
00:23:46,725 --> 00:23:49,865
Twitch livestreamers have also just switched over to YouTube.

386
00:23:50,645 --> 00:23:54,325
So again, it feels like the writing is on the wall for YouTube. This

387
00:23:54,325 --> 00:23:57,920
feels like my sign, y'all. If my next episode is like my brand new

388
00:23:57,920 --> 00:24:01,140
YouTube strategy, you know what happened. I looked at the data and was like,

389
00:24:01,360 --> 00:24:05,200
let's let's dive on in. Alright. LinkedIn.

390
00:24:05,200 --> 00:24:08,845
LinkedIn data is just up across the board. Clicks up

391
00:24:08,845 --> 00:24:12,365
by a 22%. Interactions, like I said earlier, up by

392
00:24:12,365 --> 00:24:16,145
99%. Engagement up by 51%.

393
00:24:16,445 --> 00:24:19,965
Average impressions up by 33. They're just having a winning

394
00:24:19,965 --> 00:24:23,540
year. So if LinkedIn is on your dream board,

395
00:24:24,080 --> 00:24:27,380
go for it. They also passed 1,500,000,000 profiles

396
00:24:28,080 --> 00:24:31,760
with about 310 of, million of them being

397
00:24:31,760 --> 00:24:34,575
active at least once a month. K?

398
00:24:36,095 --> 00:24:39,294
Interestingly, though, posting frequency has gone down about

399
00:24:39,294 --> 00:24:43,054
25%, year over year. So posting

400
00:24:43,054 --> 00:24:46,815
less and getting more traction, you y'all know. I'm on board. I'm

401
00:24:46,815 --> 00:24:50,630
on board. O x x, formerly known

402
00:24:50,630 --> 00:24:54,470
as Twitter. They're trying really hard to have

403
00:24:54,470 --> 00:24:57,830
a comeback, and they're seeing some success. Impressions up by

404
00:24:57,830 --> 00:25:01,350
50%, clicks up by 30%, but engagement's down by

405
00:25:01,350 --> 00:25:05,095
30%. Okay? So not as much engagement, but they are seeing more clicks

406
00:25:05,095 --> 00:25:08,615
and more impressions. I think there's a lot of feelings about that

407
00:25:08,615 --> 00:25:11,275
platform. I know I for sure have one.

408
00:25:12,055 --> 00:25:15,575
Instagram. Oh, I love I have such a love hate relationship with

409
00:25:15,575 --> 00:25:18,860
Instagram right now. But if you feel like

410
00:25:19,320 --> 00:25:22,920
your reach is all messed

411
00:25:22,920 --> 00:25:26,680
up, you're not alone. So Instagram has made

412
00:25:26,680 --> 00:25:30,460
this switch, and, actually, the data is showing that they may have made their algorithmic

413
00:25:30,520 --> 00:25:34,275
switch earlier because post regular post, reach is up

414
00:25:34,275 --> 00:25:37,955
by 21%, but Reels reach is

415
00:25:37,955 --> 00:25:41,555
down by 20%. So, actually, that to me looks like an

416
00:25:41,715 --> 00:25:45,395
like, if I if I were to, like, sneak peek on their algorithm, code, I'd

417
00:25:45,395 --> 00:25:48,980
be like, I see it there, if I could read code. Anyways,

418
00:25:50,720 --> 00:25:54,240
it'll be interesting to see how that changes over the next year. I think they're

419
00:25:54,240 --> 00:25:57,920
just trying to balance out their algorithm a little bit, and it makes sense for

420
00:25:57,920 --> 00:26:01,140
them to have a more balanced approach with post versus reels.

421
00:26:02,475 --> 00:26:05,915
I really wish they would just combine everything already because it's

422
00:26:05,915 --> 00:26:09,675
annoying to have all these different types of, places to post, but here

423
00:26:09,675 --> 00:26:13,195
we are. Also, if you feel like your engagement is

424
00:26:13,195 --> 00:26:16,410
down, the data is showing engagement

425
00:26:16,550 --> 00:26:20,170
is kinda down as far as comments and likes go.

426
00:26:20,390 --> 00:26:24,070
But when we look at other, types of engagement, shares

427
00:26:24,070 --> 00:26:27,290
and saves are, by 6%. So

428
00:26:28,465 --> 00:26:32,304
take that for what you will. And this report is broken

429
00:26:32,304 --> 00:26:35,924
down by post versus reels again. So I'm trying to, like, just glance and summarize

430
00:26:35,985 --> 00:26:38,965
for you, but read the full report.

431
00:26:39,664 --> 00:26:43,424
They note here that if you were to decide between a post or a

432
00:26:43,424 --> 00:26:46,540
reel, Reels are still offering better results.

433
00:26:47,080 --> 00:26:50,920
When compared to posts, Reels still get 52% more views

434
00:26:50,920 --> 00:26:54,760
and 34% more interactions on average. K?

435
00:26:54,760 --> 00:26:58,585
I mean, use your own data, but Reels are still getting more

436
00:26:58,585 --> 00:27:01,945
views and more interactions when compared to posts. Again, I think that will change over

437
00:27:01,945 --> 00:27:05,465
the year, but it'll be interesting to see. Stories, it it just

438
00:27:05,465 --> 00:27:08,985
continues to drop. Impressions are down by 7%, reach is down by

439
00:27:08,985 --> 00:27:12,745
7%, and posting frequency people are posting less frequency down by

440
00:27:12,745 --> 00:27:16,400
33%. Alright. Let's take a look at Facebook.

441
00:27:16,940 --> 00:27:19,820
Just downward trends all around, but,

442
00:27:20,940 --> 00:27:24,700
they're still, like, they're they have so much impact on

443
00:27:24,700 --> 00:27:28,045
everything with the most user 3,000,000,000. So, you know,

444
00:27:28,205 --> 00:27:32,045
Reels, reach is up by 13%, but everything else is

445
00:27:32,045 --> 00:27:35,425
down, post reach, post frequency, real frequency.

446
00:27:37,245 --> 00:27:41,005
Even though the there is a decline, they still have so

447
00:27:41,005 --> 00:27:44,450
many users. And what I will say is this data,

448
00:27:44,830 --> 00:27:48,130
this report doesn't take groups into account. And,

449
00:27:48,990 --> 00:27:52,750
the way my algorithm is, my whole Facebook feed is groups. That's just where I

450
00:27:52,750 --> 00:27:56,450
spend my time, so it kinda makes sense. I rarely see pages.

451
00:27:56,765 --> 00:28:00,605
I see some posts from people I follow personally, but most of my stuff

452
00:28:00,605 --> 00:28:04,205
is groups. Okay. TikTok. I know

453
00:28:04,205 --> 00:28:07,885
people are like, oh, TikTok is dying, but honestly, reach is up by 70%,

454
00:28:07,885 --> 00:28:11,670
watch time up by 71%. Engagement is down, though, by 17%.

455
00:28:11,670 --> 00:28:15,510
So if you feel like your engagement is down, it's not you, boo. Everyone

456
00:28:15,510 --> 00:28:19,030
is kind of experiencing the same thing when we look at 2023 versus

457
00:28:19,030 --> 00:28:22,870
2024. We're curious. We're curious over here to

458
00:28:22,870 --> 00:28:26,635
see what this ban will do. I left me some TikTok, and I

459
00:28:26,635 --> 00:28:30,395
don't want it to disappear. So we'll we'll see

460
00:28:30,395 --> 00:28:34,075
what happens. But, you know, they're still one of the the big guns in

461
00:28:34,075 --> 00:28:37,195
this, world of social media platforms with over

462
00:28:37,195 --> 00:28:39,615
1,000,000,000 monthly active users.

463
00:28:40,890 --> 00:28:44,270
When compared to Instagram, TikTok impressions

464
00:28:44,890 --> 00:28:47,710
are, increased by

465
00:28:47,850 --> 00:28:51,450
84%. So that means if you post the same

466
00:28:51,450 --> 00:28:54,670
video on TikTok and Instagram, all things remaining equal,

467
00:28:55,405 --> 00:28:59,085
more people are gonna see your TikTok video versus your Instagram reel.

468
00:28:59,085 --> 00:29:02,605
K? So, I mean, still post to both places, but keep in mind, you may

469
00:29:02,605 --> 00:29:06,045
see more traction on TikTok. I will say with my data, very

470
00:29:06,045 --> 00:29:09,770
anecdotally, YouTube Shorts still continues to be the the biggest contender

471
00:29:09,770 --> 00:29:12,810
here. And there's this is my writing on the wall again. I should really focus

472
00:29:12,810 --> 00:29:16,570
in on YouTube. But YouTube is just up across the board. Speaking of, that's

473
00:29:16,570 --> 00:29:20,190
what's next on here. Views up by 8%, but dislikes,

474
00:29:20,330 --> 00:29:24,135
oddly, up by 11%. Engagement is down though by

475
00:29:24,135 --> 00:29:27,815
13% on that platform. Still a lot of

476
00:29:27,815 --> 00:29:30,875
people, 2,700,000,000 monthly active users.

477
00:29:32,615 --> 00:29:36,390
But being that it is a video platform, people engage with

478
00:29:36,390 --> 00:29:40,070
platform a little bit differently than they would their Facebook or their,

479
00:29:40,070 --> 00:29:43,830
you know, threads or their Instagram. But according

480
00:29:43,830 --> 00:29:47,530
to Meta's data, users watch 200,

481
00:29:48,710 --> 00:29:52,505
billion reels per day. And right now, YouTube

482
00:29:52,505 --> 00:29:56,025
Shorts is growing. It's up to 30,000,000,000 daily

483
00:29:56,025 --> 00:29:59,865
plays. K? So 30,000,000,000 oh, sorry.

484
00:29:59,865 --> 00:30:02,665
30,000,000,000, that was 2021. It's 90,000,000,000 in

485
00:30:02,665 --> 00:30:06,280
2024. So Instagram Reels still getting more

486
00:30:06,280 --> 00:30:09,640
daily views, but YouTube is, it's increasing for

487
00:30:09,640 --> 00:30:13,480
Shorts. I still think people see YouTube as the long form

488
00:30:13,480 --> 00:30:16,919
content platform. And even when you go to, you know,

489
00:30:16,919 --> 00:30:20,695
YouTube home screen, it's still promoting mostly the long form

490
00:30:20,695 --> 00:30:24,295
video. So that kinda makes sense. But, again, I I see Shorts kind of having

491
00:30:24,295 --> 00:30:27,975
their their day in the sun coming up very soon. I know my

492
00:30:27,975 --> 00:30:31,350
husband watches videos on YouTube Shorts. And, again, he'll send them to me, and I'm

493
00:30:31,350 --> 00:30:35,130
like, I saw this on TikTok two weeks ago, but good for you, YouTube Shorts.

494
00:30:35,990 --> 00:30:39,750
Okay. That was a lot of data. As we wrap up, I

495
00:30:39,750 --> 00:30:43,290
do wanna share some of their best practices at MetraCool

496
00:30:43,795 --> 00:30:47,475
because I feel like they really do have a a really good insight on a

497
00:30:47,475 --> 00:30:51,155
lot of the industry trends with this data, and a lot of their things I

498
00:30:51,155 --> 00:30:54,775
agree with. So first, they say niche all the way down.

499
00:30:55,315 --> 00:30:59,100
It looks like the accounts that stand out the most have a very

500
00:30:59,100 --> 00:31:02,799
specific niche, a very specific, either style

501
00:31:03,260 --> 00:31:06,940
or trend or group of people that they go after. So in

502
00:31:06,940 --> 00:31:10,635
this report, for example, they're sharing a a gardening

503
00:31:10,635 --> 00:31:14,235
account with 2,600,000 followers on TikTok, and it's all

504
00:31:14,235 --> 00:31:17,914
about gardening. Okay? That's a niche. They have another one that's a crochet and

505
00:31:17,914 --> 00:31:21,674
knitting account, all about that specific niche. K? So when you think

506
00:31:21,674 --> 00:31:25,130
about the accounts that are standing out, they're niche. They

507
00:31:25,130 --> 00:31:28,730
also create high value content. K.

508
00:31:28,730 --> 00:31:31,710
High value content. People wanna see

509
00:31:32,170 --> 00:31:35,705
examples, tips and tricks. Give

510
00:31:35,705 --> 00:31:39,145
us the whole thing in the actual video. And I've been talking about this a

511
00:31:39,145 --> 00:31:42,825
lot because I think as business owners, sometimes we like to tease and

512
00:31:42,825 --> 00:31:46,665
tantalize because we want people to buy our thing, which is great and

513
00:31:46,665 --> 00:31:50,045
all, and there's a time and a place for that. But when we think about

514
00:31:50,419 --> 00:31:54,179
us as humans, how frustrating is it to watch a video where

515
00:31:54,179 --> 00:31:57,700
they're like, okay. We're gonna share three tips on how to do this.

516
00:31:57,700 --> 00:32:01,220
Here's one. But for the other two, you have to go to our

517
00:32:01,220 --> 00:32:05,059
website. Like, okay. I'm scrolling. Right? So we don't wanna do that.

518
00:32:05,059 --> 00:32:08,875
We want our our content to be a complete thought when it comes

519
00:32:08,875 --> 00:32:11,774
to its presentation in social media and in your marketing.

520
00:32:12,554 --> 00:32:16,394
Humor, still going all the way up. Humor

521
00:32:16,394 --> 00:32:20,200
is, especially for short form video, seems to

522
00:32:20,200 --> 00:32:23,100
be the way to go. Even more serious

523
00:32:23,960 --> 00:32:27,400
I'm putting that in air quotes, serious accounts like car

524
00:32:27,400 --> 00:32:30,940
salesmans, auto shop repair people. Like, we're seeing

525
00:32:31,480 --> 00:32:35,215
that when they add the humor to their posts, we love it. We we

526
00:32:35,215 --> 00:32:38,655
we share it. We like it. And so that is still doing very

527
00:32:38,655 --> 00:32:42,174
well. And then if you find a formula that

528
00:32:42,174 --> 00:32:45,794
works, keep doing the formula. I keep seeing people do this.

529
00:32:45,855 --> 00:32:49,420
I personally have a really hard time with this. Like, I'm not

530
00:32:49,580 --> 00:32:52,860
I don't I don't like to be super repetitive. But when you see a formula

531
00:32:52,860 --> 00:32:56,560
that works so for example, I'm thinking of

532
00:32:56,860 --> 00:33:00,620
the TikTok food critic, Keith Lee. Oh my god. I just told like,

533
00:33:00,620 --> 00:33:04,105
my mind totally blanked on his name. Anyways, when I think about

534
00:33:04,105 --> 00:33:07,785
Keith Lee and, like, his style of

535
00:33:07,785 --> 00:33:11,625
video, he landed on something that just works. And so

536
00:33:11,625 --> 00:33:15,085
he does that repetitively, like, the framing,

537
00:33:15,705 --> 00:33:19,550
the way that he edits. Yes, he goes to different locations

538
00:33:19,550 --> 00:33:23,310
to critique his food, but, like, as someone watching his videos, I know

539
00:33:23,310 --> 00:33:26,910
what to expect and I look forward to his style of videos, and it

540
00:33:26,910 --> 00:33:30,350
really stands out to me. And I because of that, I'm more willing to watch

541
00:33:30,350 --> 00:33:34,044
beginning to end. And the algorithm loves video completion,

542
00:33:34,044 --> 00:33:37,885
so we want that beautiful video completion rate to be top

543
00:33:37,885 --> 00:33:41,645
of mind. But that's what works when it comes

544
00:33:41,645 --> 00:33:45,405
to creating content online is having a formula that people kind of come

545
00:33:45,405 --> 00:33:49,130
to expect, and then they watch it time and time again. Let's

546
00:33:49,130 --> 00:33:51,870
see. I think they have two more things that I wanna talk about in here.

547
00:33:52,410 --> 00:33:56,250
One is my tried and true advice of, like, reposting to various

548
00:33:56,250 --> 00:33:59,770
accounts. They looked at this account called, Pizz of

549
00:33:59,770 --> 00:34:03,525
Art. Anyways, it's a pizza account. Pizza of

550
00:34:03,525 --> 00:34:06,345
Art, I guess. It's just p I z z. Anyways,

551
00:34:07,125 --> 00:34:10,885
they looked at a video posted on Instagram, got 1,800,000

552
00:34:10,885 --> 00:34:14,264
views. The same video on TikTok, 1,100,000 views.

553
00:34:14,710 --> 00:34:18,310
K. So we're looking at Instagram versus TikTok. The exact same

554
00:34:18,310 --> 00:34:21,929
video is still getting millions and millions of views across both

555
00:34:22,230 --> 00:34:25,290
channels. So repost, repost, and,

556
00:34:25,750 --> 00:34:29,545
yeah, repost again. All right, friends. That

557
00:34:29,545 --> 00:34:33,385
is the deep dive into the MetraCool twenty twenty five social

558
00:34:33,385 --> 00:34:37,225
media study. I love the data. I hope you did too. If

559
00:34:37,225 --> 00:34:40,185
you did, send me a DM on Instagram. I also love a good voice note

560
00:34:40,185 --> 00:34:43,920
DM and say, oh my gosh, that data was smexy. And although you came in

561
00:34:43,920 --> 00:34:47,600
here from the podcast. Coming up next on the

562
00:34:47,600 --> 00:34:51,360
show, you know, I release these episodes every Tuesday, y'all, and

563
00:34:51,360 --> 00:34:55,040
it's just a lot of fun. And I hope you'll continue to

564
00:34:55,040 --> 00:34:58,825
join me. So next Tuesday, I have Trang Nova to come on. She's

565
00:34:58,825 --> 00:35:02,424
gonna talk about speaking and presence. And especially for

566
00:35:02,424 --> 00:35:06,184
someone like me who's, like, very introverted and, like, put me in

567
00:35:06,184 --> 00:35:09,224
front of real people and, like, I don't know what to do with my hands

568
00:35:09,224 --> 00:35:12,940
and my pits are sweating. You'll wanna come to this session. She

569
00:35:12,940 --> 00:35:16,620
even talks about, how to translate that into online content

570
00:35:16,620 --> 00:35:20,000
as well. So that will be next Tuesday's episode.

571
00:35:20,620 --> 00:35:24,080
Also, if you're not in the Mindful Marketing Lab,

572
00:35:24,705 --> 00:35:28,465
come on in and join us. We have stuff happening all

573
00:35:28,465 --> 00:35:32,305
the dang time. Like, for instance, next week, we're having Meg Casebolt come

574
00:35:32,305 --> 00:35:35,825
in and do an SEO keyword research session for

575
00:35:35,825 --> 00:35:39,660
us, which, again, if YouTube is your thing, you'll wanna come to

576
00:35:39,660 --> 00:35:43,260
Meg's session. She just did, an audit for me, and my top

577
00:35:43,260 --> 00:35:47,100
YouTube video has 55,000 views. Like, okay. This is

578
00:35:47,100 --> 00:35:50,555
my sign. Y'all are experiencing here on the podcast for the first time. This is

579
00:35:50,555 --> 00:35:53,835
my sign to get all the way serious about YouTube. Anyways, she did an audit,

580
00:35:53,835 --> 00:35:57,115
and she did keyword research for me. So I have all these lists of keywords

581
00:35:57,115 --> 00:36:00,954
that I can do to create my YouTube videos. And so, it's been

582
00:36:00,954 --> 00:36:03,660
so helpful. I just sit down and record them, and so that's what I need

583
00:36:03,660 --> 00:36:07,040
to do next. So if you want that magic of Meg's brain,

584
00:36:07,500 --> 00:36:10,940
come to the session. It's only for lab members. Go to

585
00:36:10,940 --> 00:36:14,700
onlinedrea.com/lab and come on in and join us and get all the perks of

586
00:36:14,700 --> 00:36:18,484
unlimited strategy support courses and, workbooks and training

587
00:36:18,484 --> 00:36:21,765
materials and custom GPTs and all of it. All of it. I'll see you in

588
00:36:21,765 --> 00:36:24,645
the lab. I'll see you on the podcast next week. That's all for today. Bye

589
00:36:24,645 --> 00:36:25,305
for now.
